Playground Mulch/wood chips Unsafe and a Maintenance Nightmare
Using playground mulch as a playground surface can pose several safety and maintenance challenges, making it a less-than-ideal choice compared to specialized options like FallZone Poured-in-Place Playground Surfacing or FallZone Synthetic Grass Playground Surfacing. Here’s a breakdown of why it might be considered the “worst” option: 
Safety Concerns:
4. Allergen & Pest Issues: Organic mulch can harbor mold, fungi, or insects (e.g., termites, bees), which might trigger allergies or stings—risks not present with synthetic options.
Maintenance Challenges:
4. Weather Sensitivity: Rain soaks it, slowing drainage and creating soggy zones, while dry spells can make it dusty or brittle. This inconsistency affects usability.
Comparison to Alternatives:
– FallZone Synthetic Grass Playground Surfacing: Combining a natural grass-like look with synthetic durability, this option delivers consistent cushioning through a padded underlayer, also meeting safety standards. It drains better than mulch, resists weather extremes, and eliminates organic decay or pest issues. Plus, it stays in place, reducing mess and maintenance compared to loose-fill mulch.
Mulch is often chosen for its low initial cost and natural aesthetic, but these benefits fade when you factor in long-term safety risks and maintenance burdens. For a playground prioritizing child safety and ease of care, mulch tends to fall short. Studies, like those from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), emphasize that loose-fill materials like mulch require diligent oversight to remain safe—oversight that many facilities can’t guarantee.
In short, playground mulch’s unpredictability, hidden dangers, and upkeep demands make it a risky and labor-intensive choice compared to advanced solutions like FallZone Poured-in-Place or FallZone Synthetic Grass Surfacing.
Contact Your FallZone Surfacing Specialist Today For More Information
"*" indicates required fields